𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effect of p53 codon 72 genotype on breast cancer survival depends on p53 gene status

✍ Scribed by Ye Xu; Lihua Yao; Ailian Zhao; Tao Ouyang; Jinfeng Li; Tianfeng Wang; Zhaoqing Fan; Tie Fan; Benyao Lin; Youyong Lu; Yuntao Xie


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
French
Weight
116 KB
Volume
122
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In vitro studies suggest that __p__53 codon 72 genotype alters the apoptotic capacity of p53 protein, with the 72 arginine (R) form of wild‐type p53 harboring a greater apoptosis‐inducing potential than the 72 proline (P) variant. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the association between the p53 codon 72 genotype and breast cancer survival was modified by __p__53 gene status. In our study, we examined the __p__53 codon 72 genotype and __p__53 mutations (through exons 4–9) in paraffin‐embedded specimens from 414 breast cancer patients with a median follow‐up of 8.2 years. We report that the __p__53 codon 72 genotype was significantly associated with disease‐free survival (DFS, p = 0.02) but not with disease‐specific survival (DSS, p = 0.24) in the entire study population (n = 414). In contrast, the codon 72 genotype was strongly associated with both DFS (p = 0.001) and DSS (p = 0.04) among patients with a wild‐type __p__53 tumor (n = 346), patients with the P/P variant had worse DFS and DSS than did those with the P/R or R/R variant in this subgroup of patients. More importantly, as compared with the P/R or R/R variant, the P/P variant remained an independent prognostic factor of DFS among patients with a wild‐type __p__53 tumor (HR = 2.5; 95%CI = 1.4–4.4; p = 0.003). We conclude that the effect of __p__53 codon 72 genotype on breast cancer survival is dependent on __p__53 gene status, the P/P variant is strongly associated with poor prognosis among patients with a wild‐type __p__53 tumor. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of the codon 72 polymorphism (c.2
✍ Yun Wang; Pedro Kringen; Gunnar B. Kristensen; Ruth Holm; Mark M.O. Baekelandt; 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 104 KB

The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in Human Mutation 24: 21-34 (2004). Using a newly developed method-Arrayed Primer Extension (APEX) and direct sequencing of exon 10 and 11 to reanalyze for TP53 sequence alterations-13 new mutations were identified. In addition, a few

Effects of MDM2 promoter polymorphisms a
✍ Hongping Yu; Yu-jing Huang; Zhensheng Liu; Li-E Wang; Guojun Li; Erich M. Sturgi 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 422 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Both p53 tumor suppressor and murine double minute 2 (MDM2) oncoprotein are crucial in carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that __MDM2__ promoter single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) SNP309 T > G, A2164G, and __p53__ codon 72 are associated with risk and age at onset of squamous cell carc