๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Eddy-covariance CO2flux measurements using open- and closed-path CO2analysers: Corrections for analyser water vapour sensitivity and damping of fluctuations in air sampling tubes

โœ Scribed by R. Leuning; J. Moncrieff


Publisher
Springer
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
831 KB
Volume
53
Category
Article
ISSN
0006-8314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Methods of calibrating infrared CO2 analysers for sensitivity to CO2 and water vapour are described. Equations to correct eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements are presented for: (i) analyser cross-sensitivity to water vapour and the effects of density fluctuations arising from atmospheric fluxes of water vapour and sensible heat, (ii) flux losses caused by signal processing and limited instrument frequency response for open-and closed-path CO1 analysers, and (iii) flux losses resulting from damping of concentration fluctuations in a tube used to sample air for closed-path CO2 analysers. Examples of flux corrections required for typical instruments are presented.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Eddy-covariance CO2flux measurements usi
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 26 KB

The axis labels in Figure on p. 71 were interchanged, i.e., the y-axis should be H and the x-axis should be hE. As a result, the sentence beginning on line 6, p. 72 should read: Flux corrections increase with hE at any value of H for an analyser insensitive to water vapour (Figure ), whereas they d

Comparison of eddy-covariance measuremen
โœ R. Leuning; K. M. King ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 918 KB

Eddy fluxes of CO2 estimated using a sonic anemometer and a closed-path analyser were, on average, 16% lower than those obtained with the same anemometer and an adjacent open-path CO1 analyser. Covariances between vertical windspeed and CO2 density from the closed-path analyser were calculated using