𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

DynamicT1Measurement Using Snapshot-FLASH MRI

✍ Scribed by A. Jivan; M.A. Horsfield; A.R. Moody; G.R. Cherryman


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
160 KB
Volume
127
Category
Article
ISSN
1090-7807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The application of an inversion-recovery snapshot FLASH series of images with different T 1 weightings, and requires ( f ast low-angled shot) imaging sequence to the dynamic measureapproximately 10 minutes of imaging time. Variants of this ment of monoexponential T 1 relaxation was investigated. The ef- (10) have been used to measure multiexponential relaxfect of (a) a reduction in the overall sequence repetition time, and ation (9, 10, 12) required for accurate evaluation of T 1 in (b) an increase of the read-pulse flip angle, on the measurement some tissues. of T 1 was analyzed. The error in T 1 introduced by these factors is Multiple images have been obtained with an inversioncalculated, and a fuller analysis that takes them into account is recovery snapshot-FLASH ( fast low-angled shot) or Turpresented. Data from a phantom are used to confirm this analysis.

boFLASH imaging sequence (13), and used to measure T 1 .

The magnitude of the errors is illustrated by measuring myocardial

Here an inversion pulse is applied, and as the longitudinal T 1 in patients with acute ischaemic heart disease during the injecmagnetization recovers, a series of images is acquired. Each tion of a bolus of the contrast medium gadobenate dimeglumine.

Overall, there was a 10% difference between the T 1 values when the image is formed by applying a train of low-flip-angle pulses, approximate and exact solutions were used; this was statistically each of which gives one phase-encode line. There is a change significant. However, the difference was on average 25% for pain longitudinal magnetization due to the application of the tients with a high heart rate (because of the shorter sequencereadout pulses, and a method of correction for this has been repetition time) in areas of infarcted myocardium (because of the shown ( ).

longer T 1 ). α­§ 1997 Academic Press

If T 1 is changing rapidly, then methods that need multiple images may not be practical. Measurement of T 1 can be achieved in the shortest time by repeatedly acquiring just a THEORY


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Scan time reduction in snapshot flash MR
✍ P. M. Jakob; A. Haase πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 364 KB

## Abstract We describe the speeding up of snapshot FLASH MRI by placing a slice selection experiment before the whole imaging sequence. In conventional snapshot FLASH slice selection is made in every projection, thus consuming a great deal of experimental time. This problem can be overcome by appl

Multislice snapshot FLASH using SIMUSIM
✍ S. MΓΌller πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 246 KB

## Abstract A combination of the SIMUSIM technique and snapshot ITASH which allows efficient multislice snapshot FLASH imaging is described. Simultaneously acquired images of deliberate slice position and thickness are obtained with an increased SNR compared to standard time sequential multislice e

Flow imaging using FLASH MRI sequences
✍ Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt; Wolfgang HΓ€nicke; Jens Frahm πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 102 KB