Dual-bolus approach to quantitative measurement of pulmonary perfusion by contrast-enhanced MRI
✍ Scribed by Frank Risse; Wolfhard Semmler; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christian Fink
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 445 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate a dual‐bolus approach to pulmonary perfusion MRI.
Materials and Methods
The dual‐bolus approach uses a separate low‐dose measurement for the arterial input function (AIF) to ensure linearity. The measured AIF is constructed according to a subsequent higher dose used for the tissue concentration curves in the lung. In this study a prebolus of 0.01 mmol/kg followed by doses of 0.04 mmol/kg and 0.08 mmol/kg was used. Measurements were performed using time‐resolved two‐dimensional fast low‐angle shot (2D FLASH) MRI (TE/TR = 0.73 msec/1.73 msec; flip angle = 40°; generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) factor = 3; temporal resolution = 400 msec) in end‐inspiratory breath‐hold.
Results
The combination of prebolus/0.04 mmol/kg resulted in a pulmonary blood flow (PBF) of 211 ± 77 mL/min/100 mL, and a pulmonary blood volume (PBV) of 20 ± 3 mL/100 mL. The combination of prebolus/0.08 mmol/kg resulted in approximately 50% lower perfusion values, most likely due to saturation effects in the lung tissue.
Conclusion
A dual‐bolus approach to pulmonary perfusion MRI is feasible and may reduce the problem of lacking linear relationship between the contrast‐agent concentration and signal intensity. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To examine the sensitivity of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) perfusion maps to errors in the various source images and to determine optimal imaging parameters for reducing this sensitivity. ## Materials and Methods A detailed analysis of the precision
## Abstract ## Purpose To validate a new method for converting MR arterial signal intensity versus time curves to arterial input functions (AIFs). ## Materials and Methods The method constrains AIF with patient's cardiac output (Q). Monte Carlo simulations of MR renography and tumor perfusion pr