𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Double blind randomized trial of sucralfate vs placebo during radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers

✍ Scribed by Dennis L. Carter; Mary E. Hebert; Karen Smink; Kenneth A. Leopold; Robert L. Clough; David M. Brizel


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
86 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background. This study sought to determine whether sucralfate prophylaxis during a course of high dose radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer decreases acute side effects.

Methods. Patients receiving curative intent RT for advanced head and neck cancers participated in a single institution doubleblind randomized trial comparing sucralfate to placebo. Patients were stratified according to fractionation, use of concurrent chemotherapy, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), age, and pretreatment presence of a feeding gastrostomy. Patients were prospectively evaluated during weekly treatment checks, and analyzed with regard to time (measured in terms of dose) until development of the following: weight loss, mucositis, pain, nutritional intake, and need for a treatment break. After completion of RT, time until healing was similarly compared.

Results. Fifty-two patients received sucralfate and 50 received placebo. The mean (Β±SD) prescribed dose was 69 Β± 7 Gy. Sixty-nine patients received BID fractionation and 27 received concurrent chemotherapy. No difference was detected in any outcome measure in the direct comparison between the two groups.

On multivariate analysis, weight loss >5% or >10% occurred more frequently in patients receiving chemotherapy (p < 0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively). Grade 3 mucositis was more common in patients receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.05) or BID fractionation (p = 0.04) or having a poor KPS (p = 0.02). Interval to healing was not associated with any of the pretreatment-or treatment-related factors. Sucralfate did not result in any additional toxicity.

Conclusions. Prophylactic treatment with sucralfate during high-dose head and neck RT did not decrease acute treatment side effects. Other modalities should be investigated.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Protective effect of alpha-tocopherol in
✍ Paulo Renato Ferreira; James Freitas Fleck; Ada Diehl; Daniela Barletta; Aroldo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 115 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background. the study was designed to test whether vitamin E (VE) provides oral mucosal protection in patients with irradiated cancers of the head and neck. ## Methods. Fifty‐four patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx were randomly assigned to rinse the oral cavit

Placebo and nocebo effects in randomized
✍ Maxine de la Cruz; David Hui; Henrique A. Parsons; Eduardo Bruera πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 177 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: A significant response to placebo in randomized controlled trials of treatments for cancer‐related fatigue (CRF) had been reported. A retrospective study was conducted to determine the frequency and predictors of response to placebo effect and nocebo effects in patients

Therapeutic effect of recombinant human
✍ Hong Gyun Wu; Si Yeol Song; Yeon Sil Kim; Young Taek Oh; Chang Geol Lee; Ki Chan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 356 KB πŸ‘ 2 views
Quality of life, mucositis, and xerostom
✍ Graeme G. Duncan; Joel B. Epstein; Dongsheng Tu; Samy El Sayed; Andrea Bezjak; J πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 96 KB

## Abstract ## Background. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group undertook a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind controlled trial of an oral antimicrobial versus placebo to prevent and treat mucositis. We present the quality of life (QOL) analysis for this trial. ## Meth

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of
✍ Rene-Jean Bensadoun; Jamel Daoud; Brahim El Gueddari; Laurent Bastit; Rene Gourm πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 152 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Topical antifungal treatments are recommended but rarely used as first‐line therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) in patients with cancer. Miconazole Lauriad 50‐mg mucoadhesive buccal tablet (MBT) Loramyc reportedly delivered rapid and prolonged, effective concentr