Does “possible” ever mean “logically possible”?
✍ Scribed by Paul Gomberg
- Book ID
- 112740621
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 680 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0048-3893
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Contemporary defenders of the various versions of the ontological argument for God's existence commonly acknowledge that the cogency of each variant critically depends upon the logical coherence of a premise affirming God's existence. They commonly fail to notice, however, that the cogency of each s
If A is logically equivalent to B, it is not necessary that #(A) = p(B). This technical note proves, however, that if A is in CNF, there exists some logically equivalent DNF, B, such that p(A) = #(B). © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. Let #(P) denote the possibility of P being true, where 0 ~< p(P) ~< 1.