Edited By Dale Jacquette. Includes Bibliographical References And Index.
The logically possible, the ontologically possible and ontological proofs of God's existence
โ Scribed by David L. Paulsen
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 454 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7047
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Contemporary defenders of the various versions of the ontological argument for God's existence commonly acknowledge that the cogency of each variant critically depends upon the logical coherence of a premise affirming God's existence. They commonly fail to notice, however, that the cogency of each such argument-variant further depends on a fundamental assumption (hereafter referred to as "A") that, for any proposition, p, affirming that some state of affairs, s, (e.g., the existence of God) obtains, if (i) p is logically possible then (ii) s ontologically (or really) could obtain.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In an influential and widely-read article J. N. Findlay takes a hard look at grounds for a belief in God. The picture he draws of God is not unlike that of the poet Francis Thompson's "hound of heaven." Divine Existence, if it is to be the fitting object of truly religious attitudes, must be "inesca
In Cardinal Newman's notebook which contains the "Proof of Theism" on which Adrian Boekraad and Henry Tristram centred their book The Argument from Conscience to the Existence of God, there is a list of six arguments for the existence of God. 1 The fifth item reads -cryptically -"St. Anselm's argume