๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in the supramarginalis gyrus

โœ Scribed by Barbara Pelgrims; Etienne Olivier; Michael Andres


Book ID
102229804
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
254 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
1065-9471

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Because tool naming activates motorโ€related areas in the posterior parietal cortex, it has been suggested that conceptual knowledge of tools relies on their unique manipulation patterns. However, this view is questioned by the finding that some patients impaired in retrieving manipulation knowledge of manโ€made objects are still able to perform conceptual judgments on them. To address this issue, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to interfere with the functioning of the anterior part of the right or left supramarginalis gyrus (SMG), a region critically involved in objectโ€directed actions. rTMS was delivered in healthy participants performing four judgment tasks designed to explore different aspects of manipulation and conceptual knowledge of manโ€made objects. The two manipulation judgment tasks consisted in determining whether (1) two objects displayed on a computer screen are normally used by adopting a comparable hand posture, or (2) a given hand posture is appropriate to use an object. In the two conceptual judgment tasks, subjects had to decide whether (1) two objects displayed on the computer screen are normally used in the same context or (2) they are functionally related. We found that virtual lesions of left SMG interfere only with the performance of the manipulation judgment task in which subjects had to decide whether two different objects are used by adopting the same hand posture, all the other tasks being unaltered. rTMS applied over the right SMG had no effect. These results challenge the assumption that conceptual knowledge of tools is grounded upon motor representations. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. ยฉ 2010 Wileyโ€Liss, Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Coding and use of tactile signals from t
โœ Johansson, Roland S.; Flanagan, J. Randall ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Nature Publishing Group ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1013 KB

fast-conducting myelinated afferent neurons that convey signals to the brain from low-threshold mechanoreceptors in body areas that actively contact objects -that is, the inside of the hand, the sole of the foot, the lips, the tongue and the oral mucosa. Proprioceptive afferents fast-conducting myel

Encoding versus retrieval of spatial mem
โœ Inah Lee; Raymond P. Kesner ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 528 KB

## Abstract The hippocampus is an essential neural structure for spatial memory. Computational models suggest that the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus plays an essential role in encoding and retrieval of spatial memory. The perforant path (PPCA3) and dentate gyrus (DG)โ€mediated mossy fibers (MFs)