𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Differential prognostic impact of comorbidity in head and neck cancer

✍ Scribed by Olli-Pekka Alho; Kalle Hannula; Antti Luokkala; Heikki Teppo; Petri Koivunen; Saara Kantola


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
136 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background.

The aim was to investigate how the effect of comorbid illnesses on survival is modified by other prognostic factors in head and neck cancer.

Methods.

A population‐based retrospective cohort study involved 221 patients residing in 1 primary health care district (population about 700,000) in whom head and neck carcinoma was diagnosed between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1996. Data on clinical characteristics and survival were obtained from patient charts. Comorbidity was classified according to Charlson score.

Results.

At 3 years, the risk of death was significantly higher among the patients with high comorbidity status (score 3 or higher) (adjusted hazard ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2–3.7). The excess risk associated with comorbidity, however, was confined to the subjects aged under 65 years and those with tongue or laryngeal tumors or stage I–II cancer.

Conclusion.

To assess the prognostic significance of comorbidity for an individual patient with head and neck cancer, age, tumor site, and cancer stage must be considered. Β© 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 2007


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Impact of comorbidity on short-term mort
✍ Frank R. Datema; Marciano B. Ferrier; Marc P. van der Schroeff; Robert J. Baaten πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 178 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background In 2001, we presented a Cox regression model that is able to predict survival of the newly diagnosed patient with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This model is based on the TNM classification and other important clinical variables such as age at diagnosis,

Impact of comorbidity on outcome of youn
✍ Bhuvanesh Singh; Mahesh Bhaya; Marc Zimbler; Jordan Stern; J. Thomas Roland; Ric πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 77 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

Background. Comorbid conditions have a significant impact on the actuarial survival of patients with head and neck cancer. However, no studies have evaluated the impact of comorbidity on tumor-and treatment-specific outcomes. This study was performed to evaluate the impact of comorbidity, graded by

Tumor volume as prognostic factor in che
✍ Joost L. Knegjens; Michael Hauptmann; Frank A. Pameijer; Alfons J. Balm; Frank J πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 229 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background Tumor volume is an important predictor of outcome in radiotherapy alone. Its significance in concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT) is much less clear. We analyzed the prognostic value of primary tumor volume for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated w

Differential expression of epidermal gro
✍ Li Dao Ke; Karen Adler-Storthz; Gary L. Clayman; Alfred W. K. Yung; Zhuo Chen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 165 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: Over-expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) is associated with a variety of human malignancies, including head and neck cancer. it has also been studied for its effect on cancer cell responses to chemotherapy. to accurately measure changes in egfr expression that

Applications of brachytherapy in head an
✍ Louis B. Harrison πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 433 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Brachytherapy offers the radiation oncologist the opportunity to deliver high doses of radiation to the tumor, with minimal doses to the surrounding normal tissue. This combination enhances the therapeutic ratio. It allows for enhanced tumor control, with minimal toxicity. When utilized, it often al

Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck
✍ Mark R. Katz; Jonathan C. Irish; Gerald M. Devins; Gary M. Rodin; Patrick J. Gul πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 114 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychosocial impact of disfigurement, gender, and social support after surgical treatment of head and neck cancer. ## Method. Eighty‐two ambulatory head and neck cancer patients, 6 months or more after treatment and free of