✦ LIBER ✦

Different responsiveness of spleen lymphocytes from two lines of psychogenetically selected rats (Roman high and low avoidance)

✍ Scribed by Carmen Sandi; Nathalie Castanon; Sergio Vitiello; Pierre J. Neveu; Pierre Morméde

Book ID: 119107698
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1991
Tongue: English
Weight: 578 KB
Volume: 31
Category: Article
ISSN: 0165-5728
DOI: 10.1016/0165-5728(91)90083-j

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Inter-individual vs line/strain differen

Inter-individual vs line/strain differences in psychogenetically selected Roman High-(RHA) and Low-(RLA) Avoidance rats: neuroendocrine and behavioural aspects

✍ Thierry Steimer; Peter Driscoll 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 355 KB

Inter-individual differences in neuroendocrine and behavioural responses to environmental challenges will be considered within the context of psychogenetic selection, using the Roman High-(RHA) and Low-(RLA) Avoidance rat lines as an example. We assume that the selected genotypes, by interacting wit

Correlative effects of psychogenetic sel

Correlative effects of psychogenetic selection: A study of the roman high and low avoidance strains of rats

✍ P.L. Broadhurst; Giorgio Bignami 📂 Article 📅 1964 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 680 KB

Neuroendocrine Correlates of Emotional R

Neuroendocrine Correlates of Emotional Reactivity and Coping in Male Rats from the Roman High (RHA/Verh)-and Low (RLA/Verh)-Avoidance Lines

✍ Thierry Steimer; Susanne la Fleur; Pierre E. Schulz 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 978 KB

The effects of different doses of methyl

The effects of different doses of methylpentynol on escape/avoidance conditioning in two strains of rats selectively bred for high and low “emotionality”

✍ H. C. Holland; B. D. Gupta 📂 Article 📅 1966 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 362 KB

Any adequate evaluation of the behavioral effects of a pharmacological compound, particularly where it is assumed to act upon the nervous system, must include consideration of at least three individual factors: (a) the designated activity whereby the effect is to be measured; (b) the dosage function