𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Development and comparison of molecular assays for the rapid detection of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus

✍ Scribed by Wai-Yip Lam; Ting-Fan Leung; Nelson Lee; Jo L.K. Cheung; Apple C.M. Yeung; Yolanda I.I. Ho; Rickjason C.W. Chan; Kitty S.C. Fung; Ian G. Barr; David S.C. Hui; Joseph J.Y. Sung; Paul K.S. Chan


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
101 KB
Volume
82
Category
Article
ISSN
0146-6615

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Human infection with the novel pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus was first identified in April 2009. Two months later, the World Health Organization (WHO) had raised the pandemic level to phase 6. Rapid case identification is essential for prompt patient management and public health actions. This study developed real‐time and conventional reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (rRT‐PCR and cRT‐PCR) assays for pandemic H1N1 detection, and compared their sensitivities with protocols developed by WHO reference centres. Altogether, three rRT‐PCR and one cRT‐PCR targeting the matrix gene for universal detection of influenza A; three rRT‐PCR, one cRT‐PCR targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) gene for specific detection of pandemic H1N1; and one multiplex cRT‐PCR for differentiating co‐circulating seasonal H1N1, H3N2, and pandemic H1N1 were examined. The lower detection limit ranged from 1.252 to 125.2 copy equivalents. In general, rRT‐PCR assays were more sensitive than cRT‐PCR assays. All assays showed 100% sensitivity for “optimal” specimens (nasopharyngeal samples collected within 4 days after illness onset). For the other 36 samples, cRT‐PCR assays were less sensitive except that the new Protocol I‐cRT‐pdmH1 still retained 100% sensitivity. The new Protocol F‐rRT‐PCR‐pdmH1 was the only pandemic virus‐specific rRT‐PCR assay with 100% sensitivity across all specimen categories. In conclusion, rRT‐PCR assays are 10‐fold more sensitive than cRT‐PCR assays. The newly developed cRT‐PCR assay targeting the HA gene allows rapid, specific, and sensitive screening of this novel agent, which can serve as an alternative for laboratories where a real‐time PCR machine is not available. J. Med. Virol. 82:675–683, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Evaluation of reverse transcription loop
✍ Mina Nakauchi; Tetsushi Yoshikawa; Hidetaka Nakai; Ken Sugata; Akiko Yoshikawa; 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 76 KB

## Abstract Two genetic diagnosis systems using reverse transcription‐loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (RT‐LAMP) technology were evaluated: one for detecting the HA gene of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 virus (H1pdm RT‐LAMP) and the other for detecting the matrix gene of the influenza A

Rapid discrimination of oseltamivir-resi
✍ Mina Nakauchi; Makoto Ujike; Masatsugu Obuchi; Emi Takashita; Ikuyo Takayama; Mi 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 184 KB

## Abstract Pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 (A/H1N1pdm) virus caused significant outbreaks worldwide last year (2009). A number of oseltamivir‐resistant A/H1N1pdm viruses possessing an H275Y substitution in the neuraminidase (NA) protein were reported sporadically in several countries, including Jap

Viral load and epidemiological profile o
✍ Ana Beatriz Gorini da Veiga; Nélson Alexandre Kretzmann; Laura Trevizan Corrêa; 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 143 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Correlation between virologic profile and clinical features of patients infected by influenza virus provides important information for epidemiological control and clinical management of future disease outbreaks. Samples from patients in Southern Brazil, from June to December 2009, were