## Abstract Two genetic diagnosis systems using reverse transcription‐loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (RT‐LAMP) technology were evaluated: one for detecting the HA gene of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 virus (H1pdm RT‐LAMP) and the other for detecting the matrix gene of the influenza A
Development and comparison of molecular assays for the rapid detection of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus
✍ Scribed by Wai-Yip Lam; Ting-Fan Leung; Nelson Lee; Jo L.K. Cheung; Apple C.M. Yeung; Yolanda I.I. Ho; Rickjason C.W. Chan; Kitty S.C. Fung; Ian G. Barr; David S.C. Hui; Joseph J.Y. Sung; Paul K.S. Chan
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 101 KB
- Volume
- 82
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Human infection with the novel pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus was first identified in April 2009. Two months later, the World Health Organization (WHO) had raised the pandemic level to phase 6. Rapid case identification is essential for prompt patient management and public health actions. This study developed real‐time and conventional reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (rRT‐PCR and cRT‐PCR) assays for pandemic H1N1 detection, and compared their sensitivities with protocols developed by WHO reference centres. Altogether, three rRT‐PCR and one cRT‐PCR targeting the matrix gene for universal detection of influenza A; three rRT‐PCR, one cRT‐PCR targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) gene for specific detection of pandemic H1N1; and one multiplex cRT‐PCR for differentiating co‐circulating seasonal H1N1, H3N2, and pandemic H1N1 were examined. The lower detection limit ranged from 1.252 to 125.2 copy equivalents. In general, rRT‐PCR assays were more sensitive than cRT‐PCR assays. All assays showed 100% sensitivity for “optimal” specimens (nasopharyngeal samples collected within 4 days after illness onset). For the other 36 samples, cRT‐PCR assays were less sensitive except that the new Protocol I‐cRT‐pdmH1 still retained 100% sensitivity. The new Protocol F‐rRT‐PCR‐pdmH1 was the only pandemic virus‐specific rRT‐PCR assay with 100% sensitivity across all specimen categories. In conclusion, rRT‐PCR assays are 10‐fold more sensitive than cRT‐PCR assays. The newly developed cRT‐PCR assay targeting the HA gene allows rapid, specific, and sensitive screening of this novel agent, which can serve as an alternative for laboratories where a real‐time PCR machine is not available. J. Med. Virol. 82:675–683, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 (A/H1N1pdm) virus caused significant outbreaks worldwide last year (2009). A number of oseltamivir‐resistant A/H1N1pdm viruses possessing an H275Y substitution in the neuraminidase (NA) protein were reported sporadically in several countries, including Jap
## Abstract Correlation between virologic profile and clinical features of patients infected by influenza virus provides important information for epidemiological control and clinical management of future disease outbreaks. Samples from patients in Southern Brazil, from June to December 2009, were