𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Determining the most appropriate components for a composite clinical trial outcome

✍ Scribed by M. Angelyn Bethel; Rury Holman; Steven M. Haffner; Robert M. Califf; Alice Huntsman-Labed; Tsushung A. Hua; John McMurray

Book ID
116191469
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
613 KB
Volume
156
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6744

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

What is the most appropriate radiologic
What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? : A comparison of the available methods based on the outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trials filter
✍ Astrid J. B. Wanders; Robert B. M. LandewΓ©; Anneke Spoorenberg; Maxime Dougados; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 84 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective To select the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for the evaluation of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in clinical trials. ## Methods The validity of the currently available methods, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI),

Determining the minimum clinically impor
Determining the minimum clinically important differences for outcomes in the DOMINO trial
✍ Robert Howard; Patrick Phillips; Tony Johnson; John O'Brien; Bart Sheehan; James πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 104 KB

## Abstract ## Background Although less likely to be reported in clinical trials than expressions of the statistical significance of differences in outcomes, whether or not a treatment has delivered a specified minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is also relevant to patients and their c