𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Determination of single-strand breaks in DNA using neutral sucrose gradients

✍ Scribed by P. Crine; W.G. Verly


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1976
Tongue
English
Weight
779 KB
Volume
75
Category
Article
ISSN
0003-2697

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Separate estimations of intact apurinic sites and single-strand breaks in DNA necessitates the use of neutral sucrose gradients for sedimentation analysis after denaturation with formamide or with NaOH followed by reneutralization. The number of breaks per strand in the denatured sample, relative to a control, can be determined with the computer program of Gillespie et al. 6; the particular equation for denatured DNA in neutral sucrose gradient that relates the molecular weight and the sedimentation rate is given. The reliability of the whole technique was proven in an experiment with T7 phage [3ZP]DNA in which the 32P transmutations into ?S were the origin of the strand breaks. 583


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Matching of single-strand breaks to form
✍ D. Freifelder; B. Trumbo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1972 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 34 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Equation (9) on page 2233 should read: The equation following Eq. (10) on page 2233 should read: 4H%z(h/bc)g g = Nro4 In these equations, N is Avogadro's number.

Differentiation of apurinic/apyrimidinic
✍ Jeff Ross; Moon-Shong Tang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 493 KB

The excision repair of DNA damaged by physical or chemical agents may produce either apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites or single-strand breaks (SSB) in the DNA. Alkaline-sucrose gradient sedimentation and alkaline elution, techniques generally used for the study of DNA repair which depend upon high p

Detection of DNA single-strand breaks in
✍ O. Holz; R. Meißner; M. Einhaus; F. Koops; K. Warncke; G. Scherer; F. Adlkofer; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 548 KB

In a controlled study, ten male volunteers (five smokers and five nonsmokers) were subjected to different smoking conditions and compared to five nonsmokers, not exposed to cigarette smoke. During the 4 days of the study, nonsmoking periods were strictly controlled. On the first day the ten subjects