✦ LIBER ✦

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine

✍ Scribed by P.E. Hay; B.J. Thomas; P. Mackenzie; C. Gilchrist; H.M. Palmer; C.B. Gilroy; D. Taylor-Robinson

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1992
Tongue: English
Weight: 69 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0163-4453
DOI: 10.1016/0163-4453(92)92316-b

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Cytopathological detection of Chlamydia

Cytopathological detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginopancervical (fast) smears

✍ Luther E. Lindner; Sonja Geerling; John Nettum; Prabodh K. Gupta; Muhammad S. Sh 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 325 KB

Value of papanicolaou smear in detection

Value of papanicolaou smear in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection

✍ Dr. Ajita A. Pandit; Pushpa H. Klhilnani; Harshawardhan S. Powar; B. N. Mali; Ja 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 629 KB

Unselected urine samples in the diagnosi

Unselected urine samples in the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men

✍ G. Kudesia; R. Patel; A. Siddons; M. Ripley; R. Van Hegan; G. Kinghorn 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infec

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection

✍ Jayanti Mania-Pramanik; Shobha Potdar; Shilpa Kerkar 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 158 KB

## Abstract Important progress in the diagnosis of __Chlamydia trachomatis__ (__C. trachomatis__) includes the development of nucleic acid amplification techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR). Commercial kits are available, but they are costly, sporadic i

A new gold standard for the detection of

A new gold standard for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis?

✍ Gilles R.G. Monif 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Hindawi Publishing Corporation 🌐 English ⚖ 40 KB 👁 2 views

C ell-culture techniques have long been consid- ered the ''gold standard'' for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. The major advantage of cellculture isolation is the specificity, which approaches 100%; however, even in experienced laboratories, its sensitivity is only 70-80%. 1-3 Its primary us

BIAS IN THE EVALUATION OF DNA-AMPLIFICAT

BIAS IN THE EVALUATION OF DNA-AMPLIFICATION TESTS FOR DETECTING CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS

✍ ALULA HADGU 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 237 KB 👁 2 views

The purpose of this paper is to show that the sensitivity and specificity estimates obtained by 'discrepant analysis' are biased. Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique that attempts to provide estimates of sensitivity and specificity in the presence of an imperfect gold standard. Many resea