✦ LIBER ✦

Detecting relic gravitational waves in the CMB: A statistical bias

✍ Scribed by Wen Zhao

Book ID: 111625365
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 275 KB
Volume: 71
Category: Article
ISSN: 1434-6044
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1706-2

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Gravitational lensing as a contaminant o

Gravitational lensing as a contaminant of the gravity wave signal in the CMB

✍ Seljak, Uroš; Hirata, Christopher M. 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 The American Physical Society 🌐 English ⚖ 240 KB

The possibility of detecting gravitation

The possibility of detecting gravitational waves from a shift in the resonance frequency of an optical resonator

✍ G. G. Karapetyan 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 27 KB

A genetic algorithm for a global optimiz

A genetic algorithm for a global optimization problem arising in the detection of gravitational waves

✍ Daniela di Serafino; Susana Gomez; Leopoldo Milano; Filippo Riccio; Gerardo Tora 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 628 KB

On the detectability of post-Newtonian e

On the detectability of post-Newtonian effects in gravitational-wave emission of a coalescing binary

✍ ANDRZEJ KRÓLAK; KOSTAS D. KOKKOTAS; GERHARD SCHÄFER 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 254 KB

Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplificat

Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by A. Hadgu, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 1391–1399 (1997)

✍ Max Chernesky; John Sellors; James Mahony 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 58 KB 👁 2 views

Letter to the editor: Bias in the evalua

Letter to the editor: Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by A. Hadgu, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 1391–1399 (1997)

✍ Julius Schachter 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 51 KB 👁 2 views

Hadgu raises concerns about how diagnostic tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis are evaluated and states that 'discrepant analysis strongly biases evaluations in favour of the new test'. He questions the sensitivity and specificity figures that are generated by discrepant analysis. It may be us