## Abstract Genome‐wide association studies are helping to dissect the etiology of complex diseases. Although case‐control association tests are generally more powerful than family‐based association tests, population stratification can lead to spurious disease‐marker association or mask a true asso
Detecting association in a case-control study while correcting for population stratification
✍ Scribed by David E. Reich; David B. Goldstein
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 237 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We present a new method, the δ‐centralization (DC) method, to correct for population stratification (PS) in case‐control association studies. DC works well even when there is a lot of confounding due to PS. The latter causes overdispersion in the usual chi‐square statistics which then h
## Abstract The potential for bias from population stratification (PS) has raised concerns about case‐control studies involving admixed ethnicities. We evaluated the potential bias due to PS in relating a binary outcome with a candidate gene under simulated settings where study populations consist
## Abstract Hidden population substructure can cause population stratification and lead to false‐positive findings in population‐based genome‐wide association (GWA) studies. Given a large panel of markers scanned in a GWA study, it becomes increasingly feasible to uncover the hidden population subs
## Abstract The recent successes of GWAS based on large sample sizes motivate combining independent datasets to obtain larger sample sizes and thereby increase statistical power. Analysis methods that can accommodate different study designs, such as family‐based and case‐control designs, are of gen