Design for synergy with brand or price information
β Scribed by Ravindra Chitturi; Pallavi Chitturi; Damaraju Raghavarao
- Book ID
- 102494226
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 145 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0742-6046
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Customers' preference for the hedonic benefits (e.g., aesthetics) and utilitarian benefits (e.g., functionality) offered by a product varies depending on the contextβbuying versus selling, and choice versus willingnessβtoβpay. However, a customer's preference formation could involve brand information or price information in addition to the benefits offered by the product. It is unclear how the consideration of brand or price information influences customers' relative preference for hedonic and utilitarian product benefits. Does this information alter preference in favor of a product that offers greater utilitarian or greater hedonic benefits, and why? The results show that (1) hedonic (utilitarian) attributes have a significantly stronger influence on consumer preference when accompanied by a strong (weak) versus a weak (strong) brand; and (2) in the presence of price information, hedonic attributes have a dominant influence on consumer preference compared to in the absence of price information. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical contributions and managerial implications of design for synergy with brand or price information. Β© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this paper a methodology is proposed for the integration of lDEF1 with IDEFO, allowing an IDEFI model to be generated easily from the corresponding IDEFO model. The methodology involves: (1) the principle for the integration of lDEF1 with IDEFO based on the concepts of lDEF methods; (2) the new
Randomized optimum designs of biased-coin type are compared with other strategies for the sequential allocation of two or more treatments in a clinical trial. The emphasis is on the variance of estimated treatment contrasts. This variance, which depends on the design strategy employed, may be interp