✦ LIBER ✦

Cytologic features of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatitis: Potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Elke A. Jarboe; Lester J. Layfield

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Volume: 39
Category: Article
ISSN: 8755-1039
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21430

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Cytologic examination of pure pancreatic

Cytologic examination of pure pancreatic juice in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. The endoscopic retrograde intraductal catheter aspiration cytologic technique

✍ Akihiko Nakaizumi; Masaharu Tatsuta; Hiroyuki Uehara; Reiko Yamamoto; Akemi Take 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 558 KB

Effectiveness of the cytologic examinati

Effectiveness of the cytologic examination of pure pancreatic juice in the diagnosis of early neoplasia of the pancreas

✍ Akihiko Nakaizumi; Masaharu Tatsuta; Hiroyuki Uehara; Akemi Takenaka; Hiroyasu I 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 873 KB

Background. The early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma through the use of traditional radiographic or ultrasonographic methods is extremely difficult. Methods. To detect an early and potentially curable cancer of the pancreas, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) and aspiration cytology of

Combination of MUC5ac and WT-1 immunohis

Combination of MUC5ac and WT-1 immunohistochemistry is useful in distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma from ovarian serous carcinoma in effusion cytology

✍ Liying Han; Vaishali Pansare; Mousa Al-Abbadi; Mujtaba Husain; Jining Feng 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 192 KB

The potential diagnostic use of K-ras co

The potential diagnostic use of K-ras codon 12 and p53 alterations in brush cytology from the pancreatic head region

✍ Deery, Alastair 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 75 KB 👁 1 views

We question the originality or the practically evidenced theoretical utility of the paper by Sturm et al. 1 Could the authors be requested to explain their lack of rigour in referencing the existing literature? The sensitivity of 'real' prospective biliary brush cytology for carcinoma is evidenced t