𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Cross-commodity analysis and applications to risk management

✍ Scribed by Reik Börger; Álvaro Cartea; Rüdiger Kiesel; Gero Schindlmayr


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
321 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The understanding of joint asset return distributions is an important ingredient for managing risks of portfolios. Although this is a well‐discussed issue in fixed income and equity markets, it is a challenge for energy commodities. In this study we are concerned with describing the joint return distribution of energy‐related commodities futures, namely power, oil, gas, coal, and carbon. The objective of the study is threefold. First, we conduct a careful analysis of empirical returns and show how the class of multivariate generalized hyperbolic distributions performs in this context. Second, we present how risk measures can be computed for commodity portfolios based on generalized hyperbolic assumptions. And finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for risk management analyzing the exposure of power plants, which represent typical energy portfolios. Our main findings are that risk estimates based on a normal distribution in the context of energy commodities can be statistically improved using generalized hyperbolic distributions. Those distributions are flexible enough to incorporate many characteristics of commodity returns and yield more accurate risk estimates. Our analysis of the market suggests that carbon allowances can be a helpful tool for controlling the risk exposure of a typical energy portfolio representing a power plant. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 29:197–217, 2009


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Using risk analysis to manage software m
✍ Sherer, Susan A. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB 👁 2 views

Software maintenance management can be improved through explicit consideration of the impact of maintenance efforts on project risk, maintainability risk and usability risks, including functionality, performance, financial and software failure risk. The paper illustrates how to analyse the effect of