✦ LIBER ✦

Quality management of safety and risk analysis

✍ Scribed by Liliane Pintelon

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 183 KB
Volume: 81
Category: Article
ISSN: 0377-2217
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)90153-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Quality management of safety and risk an

Quality management of safety and risk analysis: edited by Jouko Suokas and Veikko Rouhiainen Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1993 ISBN 0-444-89864-6, Price US$168.50

✍ Louis H.J. Goossens 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 159 KB

Quality management of safety and risk an

Quality management of safety and risk analysis: Edited by J. Suokas & V. Rouhiainen. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, 1993, 291 pp. ISBN 0 444 89864 6. Price: US$168.50

✍ Alan Griffith 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 66 KB

Importance of the quality management of

Importance of the quality management of safety analysis

✍ Veikko Rouhiainen 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 979 KB

Although safety analysis is now being put to increased usage, it is often criticized for the quality of the analyses and for the resources needed. Quality systems devised for other industrial purposes offer means for developing methods and criteria to support the quality management of safety analyse

Risk tolerance and safety management

✍ R.V. Kemp 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 524 KB

## A BSTRA CT The recent introduction of the concept of risk tolerability is discussed in relation to the management of risk in high-technology industries. Differences between 'acceptable' and 'tolerable' risk are described and a model of those factors which constitute risk tolerability is present

Risk analysis and risk management

📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

Quality control in safety and risk analy

Quality control in safety and risk analyses

✍ Jouko Suokas; Veikko Rouhiainen 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 1002 KB

Quality factors, such as the level of documentation, coverage of hazard identification and accuracy of consequence estimation, affect the use of results and the cost-effectiveness of analyses. This paper reviews the potential for quality evaluation, and presents results from several comparable quali