𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Critically Evaluated Termination Rate Coefficients for Free-Radical Polymerization, 1. The Current Situation

✍ Scribed by Michael Buback; Mark Egorov; Robert G. Gilbert; Vladimir Kaminsky; Oskar F. Olaj; Gregory T. Russell; Philipp Vana; Gerhard Zifferer


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
175 KB
Volume
203
Category
Article
ISSN
1022-1352

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

This is the first publication of an IUPAC‐sponsored Task Group on “Critically evaluated termination rate coefficients for free‐radical polymerization.” The paper summarizes the current situation with regard to the reliability of values of termination rate coefficients k~t~. It begins by illustrating the stark reality that there is large and unacceptable scatter in literature values of k~t~, and it is pointed out that some reasons for this are relatively easily remedied. However, the major reason for this situation is the inherent complexity of the phenomenon of termination in free‐radical polymerization. It is our impression that this complexity is only incompletely grasped by many workers in the field, and a consequence of this tendency to oversimplify is that misunderstanding of and disagreement about termination are rampant. Therefore this paper presents a full discussion of the intricacies of k~t~: sections deal with diffusion control, conversion dependence, chain‐length dependence, steady state and non‐steady state measurements, activation energies and activation volumes, combination and disproportionation, and theories. All the presented concepts are developed from first principles, and only rigorous, fully‐documented experimental results and theoretical investigations are cited as evidence. For this reason it can be said that this paper summarizes all that we, as a cross‐section of workers in the field, agree on about termination in free‐radical polymerization. Our discussion naturally leads to a series of recommendations regarding measurement of k~t~ and reaching a more satisfactory understanding of this very important rate coefficient.

Variation of termination rate coefficient k~t~ with inverse absolute temperature T^−1^ for bulk polymerization of methyl methacrylate at ambient pressure.^[6]^ The plot contains all tabulated values^[6]^ (including those categorized as “recalculated”) except ones from polymerizations noted as involving solvent or above‐ambient pressures.

magnified imageVariation of termination rate coefficient k~t~ with inverse absolute temperature T^−1^ for bulk polymerization of methyl methacrylate at ambient pressure.^[6]^ The plot contains all tabulated values^[6]^ (including those categorized as “recalculated”) except ones from polymerizations noted as involving solvent or above‐ambient pressures.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Critically Evaluated Rate Coefficients f
✍ Sabine Beuermann; Michael Buback; Thomas P. Davis; Nuria García; Robert G. Gilbe 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB

## Abstract Propagation rate coefficients, __k__~p~, which have been previously reported by several groups for free‐radical bulk polymerizations of cyclohexyl methacrylate (CHMA), glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), benzyl methacrylate (BzMA), and isobornyl methacrylate (iBoMA) are critically evaluated. A

Critically Evaluated Rate Coefficients f
✍ José M. Asua; Sabine Beuermann; Michael Buback; Patrice Castignolles; Bernadette 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 143 KB

## Abstract Summary: Propagation rate coefficients, __k__~p~, for free‐radical polymerization of butyl acrylate (BA) previously reported by several groups are critically evaluated. All data were determined by the combination of pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) and subsequent polymer analysis by si

Critically evaluated rate coefficients f
✍ Michael Buback; Robert G. Gilbert; Robin A. Hutchinson; Bert Klumperman; Frank-D 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 689 KB

## Abstract Pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) in conjugation with molecular weight distribution (MWD) measurement has emerged as the method of choice for determining the propagation rate coefficient __k__~p~ in free‐radical polymerizations. Detailed guidelines for using this technique (including es

Critically evaluated rate coefficients f
✍ Sabine Beuermann; Michael Buback; Thomas P. Davis; Robert G. Gilbert; Robin A. H 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 867 KB

## Abstract Pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) in conjunction with molar mass distribution (MMD) measurement is the method of choice for determining the propagation rate coefficient __k__~p~ in free‐radical polymerizations. The authors, members of the IUPAC Working Party on __Modeling of kinetics an

Towards the propagation rate coefficient
✍ Friedhelm Bandermann; Claus Günther; Johannes Schweer 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 811 KB

The propagation rate coefficient k, for the free-radical polymerization of 1,3-butadiene was determined as a function of temperature in the range of 30-60°C in bulk and as a function of the concentration of 1,3-butadiene in chlorobenzene at 50°C using a combination of a UV flash-lamp induced polymer