## Abstract Summary: Propagation rate coefficients, __k__~p~, for free‐radical polymerization of butyl acrylate (BA) previously reported by several groups are critically evaluated. All data were determined by the combination of pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) and subsequent polymer analysis by si
Critically Evaluated Rate Coefficients for Free-Radical Polymerization, 4
✍ Scribed by Sabine Beuermann; Michael Buback; Thomas P. Davis; Nuria García; Robert G. Gilbert; Robin A. Hutchinson; Atsushi Kajiwara; Mikiharu Kamachi; Igor Lacík; Gregory T. Russell
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 173 KB
- Volume
- 204
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1022-1352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Propagation rate coefficients, k~p~, which have been previously reported by several groups for free‐radical bulk polymerizations of cyclohexyl methacrylate (CHMA), glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), benzyl methacrylate (BzMA), and isobornyl methacrylate (iBoMA) are critically evaluated. All data were determined by the combination of pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) and subsequent polymer analysis by size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC). This so‐called PLP‐SEC technique has been recommended as the method of choice for the determination of k~p~ by the IUPAC Working Party on Modeling of Polymerisation Kinetics and Processes. The present data fulfill consistency criteria and the agreement among the data from different laboratories is remarkable. The values for CHMA, GMA, and BzMA are therefore recommended as constituting benchmark data sets for each monomer. The data for iBoMA are also considered reliable, but since SEC calibration was established only by a single group, the data are not considered as a benchmark data set. All k~p~ data for each monomer are best fitted by the following Arrhenius relations: CHMA: $k_{\rm p} = 10^{6.80} ;{\rm L} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} \cdot {\rm s}^{ - 1} \exp \left( {{{ - 23.0;{\rm kJ} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} } \over {{\rm R} \cdot T}}} \right)$, GMA: $k_{\rm p} = 10^{6.79} ;{\rm L} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} \cdot {\rm s}^{ - 1} \exp \left( {{{ - 22.9;{\rm kJ} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} } \over {{\rm R} \cdot T}}} \right)$, BzMA: $k_{\rm p} = 10^{6.83} ;{\rm L} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} \cdot {\rm s}^{ - 1} \exp \left( {{{ - 22.9;{\rm kJ} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} } \over {{\rm R} \cdot T}}} \right)$, iBoMA: $k_{\rm p} = 10^{6.79} ;{\rm L} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} \cdot {\rm s}^{ - 1} \exp \left( {{{ - 23.1;{\rm kJ} \cdot {\rm mol}^{ - 1} } \over {{\rm R} \cdot T}}} \right)$. Rather remarkably, for the methacrylates under investigation, the k~p~ values are all very similar. Thus, all data can be fitted well by a single Arrhenius relation resulting in a pre‐exponential factor of 4.24 × 10^6^ L · mol^−1^ · s^−1^ and an activation energy of 21.9 kJ · mol^−1^. All activation parameters refer to bulk polymerizations at ambient pressure and temperatures below 100 °C. Joint confidence intervals are also provided, enabling values and uncertainties for k~p~ to be estimated at any temperature.
95% joint confidence intervals for Arrhenius parameters A and E~A~ for cyclohexyl (CHMA), glycidyl (GMA), benzyl (BzMA), and isobornyl (iBoMA) methacrylate; for details see text.
magnified image95% joint confidence intervals for Arrhenius parameters A and E~A~ for cyclohexyl (CHMA), glycidyl (GMA), benzyl (BzMA), and isobornyl (iBoMA) methacrylate; for details see text.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) in conjunction with molar mass distribution (MMD) measurement is the method of choice for determining the propagation rate coefficient __k__~p~ in free‐radical polymerizations. The authors, members of the IUPAC Working Party on __Modeling of kinetics an
## Abstract Pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) in conjugation with molecular weight distribution (MWD) measurement has emerged as the method of choice for determining the propagation rate coefficient __k__~p~ in free‐radical polymerizations. Detailed guidelines for using this technique (including es
## Abstract This is the first publication of an IUPAC‐sponsored Task Group on “Critically evaluated termination rate coefficients for free‐radical polymerization.” The paper summarizes the current situation with regard to the reliability of values of termination rate coefficients __k__~t~. It begin