## Abstract Covariance inflation plays an important role within the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) in preventing filter divergence and handling model errors. However the inflation factor needs to be tuned and tuning a parameter in the EnKF is expensive. Previous studies have adaptively estimated the
Covariance localisation and balance in an Ensemble Kalman Filter
✍ Scribed by Jeffrey D. Kepert
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 519 KB
- Volume
- 135
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0035-9009
- DOI
- 10.1002/qj.443
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A major limitation of the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is that the finite ensemble size introduces sampling error into the background covariances, with severe consequences for atmospheric and oceanographic applications. The negative effects of sampling error are customarily limited by covariance localisation, which earlier studies have suggested may introduce imbalance into the system. The deleterious effects of localisation upon balance are confirmed and detailed here, with localisation producing analyses with weaker geostrophic balance and stronger divergence than are obtained using the unlocalised covariances. These imbalances reduce as the localisation radius is increased, but are argued to be large for typical settings. An improved method for calculating local covariances from an ensemble is presented, in which the localisation is performed in streamfunction–velocity potential (ψ–χ), rather than wind component, space. Analyses using this method better preserve the balances contained within the unlocalised covariance model. This transformation further allows the option of intervariable localisation, in which the cross‐covariances involving χ, which are weak and therefore particularly subject to sampling error, are set to 0 instead of being calculated from the ensemble. The various localisations are compared in a series of identical‐twin experiments, with the new localisations producing analyses that are better balanced and significantly more accurate than the usual approach. The localisation with the χ cross‐covariances set to 0 is shown to be superior for the smaller ensemble sizes but not for the larger, implying that the larger ensembles are capable of resolving some of the true χ cross‐covariance in the test system. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Analysis sensitivity indicates the sensitivity of an analysis to the observations, which is complementary to the sensitivity of the analysis to the background. In this paper, we discuss a method to calculate this quantity in an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). The calculation procedure an
## Abstract We propose an ensemble sensitivity method to calculate observation impacts similar to Langland and Baker (2004) but without the need for an adjoint model, which is not always available for numerical weather prediction models. The formulation is tested on the Lorenz 40‐variable model, an
## Abstract The ensemble sensitivity method proposed by Liu and Kalnay (2008) to estimate the impact of observations on reducing forecast error is shown to have a slight error and is corrected here. The corrected formula captures the actual forecast error reduction better and removes the positive b
## Abstract The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has been widely tested as a possible candidate for the next generation of meteorological and oceanographic data assimilation algorithms. While a number of tests with models of varying realism have been successfully performed, the EnKF has been seldom ev
## Abstract In this study, a new Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) algorithm called EnKF with growing‐error correction (EnKF‐GEC) is developed for minimizing the growing component of the forecast error; for this purpose, prospective observations are assimilated using empirical singular vectors (ESVs).