A simple way to incorporate the solvent-peptide interaction in any available theory of the helix-coil transition is developed. The competition between the intramolecular hydrogen bonding and the solvent-polymer hydrogen bonding is considered in multicomponent solvents where some of the components ha
Coupling between the helix–coil transition and nematic–isotropic transitions in polypeptide solutions
✍ Scribed by Robert R. Matheson Jr.
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 237 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-3525
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The lattice model of Flory has been extended in order to consider equilibrium between isotropic and nematic phases containing helix-coil type chains. Nearly complete exclusion of coil sequences from the lyotropic nematic phase produces an enhanced cooperativity in the helixxoil transition. In poor solvents this enhancement begins to occur at concentrations typical of some experiments. * The particular conformation in which the chain is completely helical must be examined as a special case. It is used here for the conformation in the nematic phase as an approximation. Further discussion is forthcoming in our work in preparation.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Conformation of Polypeptide i n the Helix-Coil Transition Region A recently published work by Go, Saito, and Ochiail presented a calculation of the mean values of the second (R2) and the fourth (R4) powers of the end-to-end distance of the polypeptide chain in the helix-coil transition region.
Water-insoluble films of poly-L-lysine, crosslinked with formaldehyde, were suspended in aqueous media and their relative lengths measured as a function of pH. A sharp transition of the polymer was observed in the pH range which corresponded with that observed in polylysine solutions by optical rota
CQMMUNICATIONS TO THE EDITOR ## Conformation of Polypeptides i n the Helix-Coil Transition Region: Revised Calculation f o r the Fourth Moment Recently Birshtein' pointed out errors in our c.alc.ulation2 of the fourth monient (R4 ) We thus made revised calculations for (R4) and the deviation fro