A group of 154 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, treated with platinum-based induction chemotherapy, were followed up for 5 years and several pretreatment characteristics were analyzed for possible correlation to a complete response (CR) to chemotherapy, time to progression (TTP)
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin-based chemoradiation to treat patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic head and neck cancer in Brazil
✍ Scribed by Alexandra Brentani; Gilberto de Castro Jr; Miriam H. Federico
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 307 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the cost‐effectiveness of cisplatin‐based chemoradiation compared to radiation therapy (RT) alone to treat patients with advanced head and neck cancer in Brazil.
Methods.
Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of 33 patients treated with RT alone (strategy 1) and from 29 patients treated with cisplatin‐based chemoradiation (strategy 2). The Brazilian National Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS]) reimbursement parameters perspective was considered, and the effectiveness was measured in years of disease‐free life gained. One‐way sensitivity analysis was performed to determine robustness of this study.
Results.
In strategy 1, there were 31% of the patients who lived without disease progression for more than 13 months after treatment, compared to 58% of patients in strategy 2. According to SUS parameters, the total cost per patient in strategy 1 was $1167.00 U.S. dollars and in strategy 2, it was $2058.00 U.S. dollars. Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $3303.00 U.S. dollars per life‐year gained.
Conclusion.
Cisplatin‐based chemoradiation proved to be more cost‐effective than RT alone. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2011
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES