✦ LIBER ✦

Contrast behavior of high-spatial-resolution T1-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T

✍ Scribed by Hiroyoshi Isoda; Shigeki Arizono; Kotaro Shimada; Yuusuke Hirokawa; Yoji S. Maetani; Masako Kataoka; Yuji Nakamoto; Toshiya Shibata; Kaori Togashi

Book ID: 113543259
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 402 KB
Volume: 35
Category: Article
ISSN: 0899-7071
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.004

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-e

Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5

✍ Ayano Akita; Hiroshi Shinmoto; Shigenori Hayashi; Hirotaka Akita; Takuma Fujii; 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 566 KB

High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiog

High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): Comparison of 3 T vs. 1.5 T

✍ Shigeki Arizono; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Yoji S. Maetani; Yuusuke Hirokawa; Kotaro Shim 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 345 KB

MR high-resolution imaging of arterial i

MR high-resolution imaging of arterial intimal hyperplasia at 1.5 T

✍ C. Sampson; R. Edmondson; J. Keegan; S. Humphreys; R. Hughes; D. Talbot; P. Andr 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 444 KB

MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: Prelimi

MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers

✍ Hiroyoshi Isoda; Masako Kataoka; Yoji Maetani; Aki Kido; Shigeaki Umeoka; Ken Ta 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 227 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T on image quality. ## Materials and Methods Fourteen volunteers were examined at both 1.5T and 3.0T using MRCP imaging performed with a breath‐held two‐dimensional (2D) hal

MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for

MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: Comparison with imaging at 1.5 T

✍ Masatoshi Hori; Tonsok Kim; Takamichi Murakami; Izumi Imaoka; Hiromitsu Onishi; 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 464 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To prospectively compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T and 1.5 T in the same patients for preoperative evaluation of endometrial carcinoma. ## Materials and Methods Thirty consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma underwent MRI at both 3.0 T and 1.5 T as

In vivo high-resolution magnetic resonan

In vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance skin imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T

✍ Joëlle K. Barral; Neal K. Bangerter; Bob S. Hu; Dwight G. Nishimura 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 336 KB 👁 1 views

As a noninvasive modality, MR is attractive for in vivo skin imaging. Its unique soft tissue contrast makes it an ideal imaging modality to study the skin water content and to resolve the different skin layers. In this work, the challenges of in vivo high-resolution skin imaging are addressed. Three