Contexts for evaluating educational software
β Scribed by A Jones; E Scanlon; C Tosunoglu; E Morris; S Ross; P Butcher; J Greenberg
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 87 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0953-5438
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The evaluation of educational software is of concern to two particular academic communities: HCI and educational technology. There is a danger that usability features are considered at the expense of educational issues (and the converse of this is of course equally true). This paper considers how the notion and practice of evaluation in the educational community differs from that in HCI and also identifies areas of overlap. It then describes how particular influences and contexts have led one group of evaluators from the educational community to develop a context, interactions, attitudes and outcomes (CIAO!) model of evaluation for computer assisted learning (CAL) evaluation in distance education. The application of this model is illustrated by case studies from a recent evaluation project and related research. The paper concludes with a discussion of the issues raised for both communities by this model for evaluation.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
An evaluation method of educational software has been developed. It was derived from users' answers, grouped in three different categories-contents and teaching methodology; program design characteristics; and user reaction-and a fourth group encompassing more general considerations. This method all
Teachers need to be able to evaluate predictively educational software so that they can make decisions about what software to purchase and how to use software in classrooms. The conventional approach to predictive evaluation is to use a checklist. We argue that checklists are seriously flawed in pri