๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Consequenties van vergrijzing

โœ Scribed by Joost van Vliet

Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Year
2009
Weight
179 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1567-6587

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Terrorism and consequentialism
Terrorism and consequentialism
โœ Burleigh T. Wilkins ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 605 KB

In discussions of terrorism one would expect to encounter a significant division between consequentialists on the one hand and deontologists on the other. One would expect to find consequentialists arguing that terrorism could be justified if, on balance, it advanced the cause of the good over alter

The formalism-consequentialism distincti
The formalism-consequentialism distinction
โœ Michael D. Smith ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 311 KB

One of the more basic distinctions usually drawn in metaethics is between formalist (deontological) and consequentialist (teleological) systems of moral reasoning. Andrew Oldenquist has recently argued that there is no difference between these two types of system, and that each is therefore trivial.