๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Consequences, desirability, and the moral fanaticism argument

โœ Scribed by Marcus G. Singer

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
605 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-8116

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Act utilitarianism and the moral fanatic
Act utilitarianism and the moral fanaticism argument
โœ Mark Timmons ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 605 KB

Act utilitarianism generally and various act utilitarian (AU) principles, have received a good deal of attention from philosophers -most of it negative and destructive in character. Indeed, it is hard to find a contemporary philosopher who would admit to being an act utilitarian; the problems are nu

Compatibilism and the consequence argume
Compatibilism and the consequence argument
โœ Terence Horgan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 981 KB

Peter van Inwagen, in an influential paper and again in a recent book, has propounded an important argument for the incompatibility of free will and determinism. 1 Of the various replies that have appeared in response to his original paper, perhaps the most incisive is by David Lewis. 2 Although van