𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Concentric needle electrode for neuromuscular jitter analysis

✍ Scribed by Mustafa Ertaş; M. Bariş Baslo; Nebil Yildiz; Jale Yazici; A. Emre Öge


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
127 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We used a concentric needle electrode (CNE) with 2 kHZ low-cut filter and a single fiber electrode (SFE) in the same subjects for neuromuscular jitter measurement in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and orbicularis oculi (OOc) muscles. At the same session, 20 jitter values were obtained from each subject with each electrode. For EDC (during voluntary contraction), mean jitter values with SFE and CNE were 23.4 +/- 8 micros and 23.3 +/- 8 micros in 10 normals; and 56.8 +/- 28 micros and 57.4 +/- 33 micros in 10 myasthenics. For OOc (during electrical stimulation), mean jitter values with SFE and CNE were 17.9 +/- 5 micros and 16.3 +/- 4 micros in 11 normal subjects, and 41.2 +/- 29 micros and 36.7 +/- 27 micros in 10 myasthenics. For both muscles, the numbers of individual abnormal jitter values with SFE and CNE were highly comparable. Both needles labeled the same patients as having "normal" or "abnormal" neuromuscular transmission. CNE may be an alternative to SFE in neuromuscular jitter analysis.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Concentric and single fiber needle elect
✍ Maria E. Farrugia; Andrew I. Weir; Marie Cleary; Sarah Cooper; Richard Metcalfe; 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB

## Abstract The single fiber needle electrode (SFNE), which is designed to isolate single muscle fiber action potentials, has played an important role in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the concentric needle electrode (CNE) has been recently adopted by some workers to study neurom

Sensitivity for detecting fibrillation p
✍ Howard B. Sherman; Dr. Francis O. Walker; Peter D. Donofrio 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 300 KB

## Abstract The sensitivity of monopolar and concentric electrodes for detecting fibrillation potentials (FP) has never been formally compared. We studied 35 muscles with FP, sampling 20 sites each with concentric and monopolar needles. The concentric needle identified 0.88 ± 3.44 (mean ± standard