Sensitivity for detecting fibrillation potentials: A comparison between concentric and monopolar needle electrodes
β Scribed by Howard B. Sherman; Dr. Francis O. Walker; Peter D. Donofrio
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 300 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0148-639X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The sensitivity of monopolar and concentric electrodes for detecting fibrillation potentials (FP) has never been formally compared. We studied 35 muscles with FP, sampling 20 sites each with concentric and monopolar needles. The concentric needle identified 0.88 Β± 3.44 (mean Β± standard deviation) more sites with spontaneous activity. Although statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test P < .03), this difference in sensitivity did not appreciably affect diagnostic interpretation. Subjects described the concentric needles as more painful. Needle insertions in 25 other muscles demonstrated that needle movement generated the majority of FP. We suggest that the increased tissue injury caused by concentric needles may account for both their increased sensitivity and discomfort.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Aims The aim of this study is to compare two different surface electrodes (intravaginal and intraurethral) with the concentric needle as a criterion standard and concomitant testing of the levator ani as a potential contaminator. ## Methods Thirty healthy women with a mean age of
## Heavy metal impurities occur in contaminated water resources and industrial streams in trace amounts and very often in the presence of much higher concentrations of indifferent electrolytes. It is shown that under diffusion controlled conditions, the removal efficiency of metallic contaminants