Components of genetic variance for plant survival and vigor of apple trees
โ Scribed by R. Watkins; L. P. S. Spangelo
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1970
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 949 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0040-5752
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The additive and non-additive variance components were estimated from progenies derived from two samples of parents (representing a northern continental type climate) for five factors relating to plant survival and two composites of the factors. It was found that additive variance made up 90 and 100%, 91 and 100%, 91 and 100%, 100 and 100%, 82 and 59%, 91 and 100%, and 90 and 100% of the total genetic variance for leafing-out date, leafingout percent, tip injury, stem damage, root damage, a shoot composite, and a shoot-root composite for the two samples respectively. A third sample had 100% additive variance for plant height while, in contrast, a sample of rootstocks, differing from each other in their ability to dwarf grafted scions, had approximately 50-70% additive variance for plant height. It was shown that breeding progress for both winter survival and plant height could be achieved by exploiting the additive variance, the total genetic variance, or (where progenies were the selection unit rather than individuals) by progeny selection. By exploiting the additive variance, it should be possible to improve plant survival and change plant height in each of several successive generations. It is predicted that (with the exception of selection for vigor in a population having a range of dwarfing abilities) potential parents could be efficiently screened phenotypically and so obviate the need for genotypic evaluation. A total of 9180 progeny trees were involved in the analyses considered in this paper.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Several authors have considered two-locus models as a basis for the inheritance of complex diseases. The purpose of this paper is to give a simple general formulation to derive the additive, dominant, and epistatic effects, and hence the corresponding variance components, for any multilocus model. T
The aim of this paper was to compare several methods of estimating the genetic components of a quantitative trait in familial data. The Expectation and Maximization (E-M) algorithm, the Newton-Raphson method, and the scoring method were compared for estimating polygenic and environmental effects on
## Abstract The paper deals with the problem of sampling error of genotypic correlation estimated from a randomised block design. The Bootstrap method is used and two different procedures are studied. Both standard deviations and confidence intervals for the genotypic correlations are calculated in