✦ LIBER ✦

Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion

✍ Scribed by A. F. Snoeck Henkemans

Book ID: 111560458
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 60 KB
Volume: 17
Category: Article
ISSN: 0920-427X
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026390419589

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A.F. Snoeck Henkemans,analysing complex

A.F. Snoeck Henkemans,analysing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion

✍ Robert C. Pinto 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 194 KB

Promoting critical, elaborative discussi

Promoting critical, elaborative discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams

✍ Oliver Scheuer, Bruce M. McLaren, Armin Weinberger, Sabine Niebuhr 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 438 KB

Dialectical Features of Students’ Argume

Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education

✍ Jan Alexis Nielsen 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 317 KB

Critical Legal Studies and argumentation

Critical Legal Studies and argumentation theory

✍ Dale A. Herbeck 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 698 KB

Complexity theory as an approach to expl

Complexity theory as an approach to explanation in healthcare: A critical discussion

✍ John Paley; Gail Eva 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 199 KB

Relevance and digressions in argumentati

Relevance and digressions in argumentative discussion: A pragmatic approach

✍ Scott Jacobs; Sally Jackson 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 920 KB

Digressions in argumentative discussion are a kind of failure of relevance. Examination of what actual cases look like reveals several properties of argumentative relevance: (1) The informational relevance of propositions to the truth value of a conclusion should be distinguished from the pragmatic