✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of two quantitative GC–MS methods for analysis of tomato aroma based on purge-and-trap and on solid-phase microextraction

✍ Scribed by J. Beltran; E. Serrano; F. J. López; A. Peruga; M. Valcarcel; S. Rosello

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 369 KB
Volume: 385
Category: Article
ISSN: 1618-2650
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-0410-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of the performance of analyti

Comparison of the performance of analytical methods based on solid-phase extraction and on solid-phase microextraction for the determination of antifouling booster biocides in natural waters

✍ I. K. Konstantinou; D. G. Hela; D. A. Lambropoulou; V. A. Sakkas; T. A. Albanis 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 641 KB

On-line coupling of in-tube solid phase

On-line coupling of in-tube solid phase microextraction (SPME) to HPLC for analysis of carbamates in water samples: Comparison of two commercially available autosamplers

✍ Yanni Gou; Charalambos Tragas; Heather Lord; Janusz Pawliszyn 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 154 KB 👁 1 views

In-tube solid phase microextraction SPME is a new on-line sample preparation technique that is easily installed on a conventional high-performance Ž . liquid chromatography HPLC autosampler, and has previously been used with the LC Packings FAMOS autosampler without modification of the autosampler i