𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On-line coupling of in-tube solid phase microextraction (SPME) to HPLC for analysis of carbamates in water samples: Comparison of two commercially available autosamplers

✍ Scribed by Yanni Gou; Charalambos Tragas; Heather Lord; Janusz Pawliszyn


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
154 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1040-7685

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In-tube solid phase microextraction SPME is a new on-line sample preparation technique that is easily installed on a conventional high-performance Ž . liquid chromatography HPLC autosampler, and has previously been used with the LC Packings FAMOS autosampler without modification of the autosampler itself. This paper describes the on-line coupling of in-tube SPME to a Hewlett Packard Ž . HP model 1100 HPLC autosampler, and reports on several fundamental aspects of the technology. The extraction and desorption processes with this system were thoroughly studied for a group of carbamate pesticides in water samples. The similarities and differences of the in-tube SPME technique with the two different autosamplers, FAMOS and Hewlett Packard, were compared during method development. The optimized conditions were successfully applied to extract the carbamates of interest from spiked surface, well, and tap water samples, exhibiting Ž . excellent method precision. The % relative standard deviation RSD for all the carbamates studied in the different environmental water samples was between 0.8 and 6.0%. There was no noticeable extraction efficiency decrease relative to pure laboratory samples when the method was applied to spiked environmental water samples. The method was found to be linear between 2 and 20,000 grL with correlation coefficients in the range of 0.9791 to 0.9991. With respect to the Ž . different water samples, the limits of detection LODs for all the carbamates studied were in the range of 0.44᎐17 grL. For carbaryl, the LODs were between 0.44 and 0.67 grL, which were lower than those obtained using the in-tube SPME method with the FAMOS autosampler.