𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of Three Different Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Interfacing Techniques for the Determination of Priority Phenolic Compounds in Water

✍ Scribed by Puig, D.; Barcelo, D.; Silgoner, I.; Grasserbauer, M.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
966 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
1076-5174

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A comparative study of the performance of three liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) interfacing techniques, thermospray (TSP), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and ionspray (ISP) for the analysis of priority phenolic compounds was carried out, using the negative ion mode (NI). When using the TSP interface, IM -HIor [M + CH,COO] -were obtained as the main ions. APCI and ISP interfaces gave [ M -H j -as the main ion with an optimal extraction voltage in the range of 20-30 V. Phenol, 4-methylphenol and 2,4-dimethylphenol could only be monitored with ISP by raising the organic modifier percentage to 100%. Hence a porous graphitic carbon (PGC) analytical column was used instead to elute the analytes in a suitable retention window. Calibration graphs were linear from 1 to 100 ng for each compound with repeatability values of 15-20%. Instrumental detection limits (IDLs) obtained with ISP were in the range of those of TSP. An improvement of one order of magnitude could be achieved when working with APCL, which gave IDLs ranging from 3 to 180 ng in full scan and from 0.001 to 0.085 ng in single ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Furthermore, in APCI abundant structural information was obtained via fragmentation by raising the cone voltage from 20 to 60 V.

Application to the analysis of water samples after preconcentration using sulfonated styrene divinylbenzene (SDB-RPS) Empore disks is also reported. The entire analytical protocol was validated by analyzing samples at low pg/l levels distributed by the Aquacheck interlaboratory program (WRC, Medmenham, UK).


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of the sensitivities of sixte
✍ M. A. Crespín; S. Cárdenas; M. Gallego; M. Valcárcel 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB 👁 2 views

The analytical performances of the electron impact and chemical (positive and negative) ionization modes in the mass spectrometric identification and quantitation of phenols were studied simultaneously. Twenty phenols containing different substituents (viz. chloro, nitro, amino, alkyl and sulphonic

Comparison of different extraction metho
✍ Soon-Kil Cho; A. M. Abd El-Aty; Hyang-Rang Jeon; Jeong-Heui Choi; Ho-Chul Shin; 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The methods of simultaneous extraction of iprodione, chlorpyrifos‐methyl, EPN and endosulfan (with its metabolites) from kiwi fruit using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), and liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) were tested and compared in terms of t

A Simple High Performance Liquid Chromat
✍ Julie C. Marr; James B. King 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 106 KB 👁 2 views

A method has been developed for the direct determination of paraquat and diquat in water samples. No sample preparation was required and analysis was done using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with ionspray tandem mass spectrometry. Heptafluorobutyric acid was used as the ion-pair age

Determination of phenolic compounds in e
✍ Hakim Faraji; Syed W. Husain; Masoumeh Helalizadeh 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 221 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract A novel approach for the sample pre‐treatment and determination of eight phenolic compounds in environmental water samples has been developed by hyphenating solid‐phase extraction (SPE) and liquid‐phase microextraction (LPME) techniques based on solid organic drop combined with gas chro