𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of ThinPrep® and Conventional Preparations: Urine Cytology Evaluation

✍ Scribed by U.K. Luthra; Pranab Dey; Josely George; Mohmed A. Abdulla; Azza Abdul Aziz Shaheen; Zafar A. Sheikh; Sara Shirly George


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
59 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
8755-1039

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional
✍ Chung Shan Leung; Brian Chiu; Valerie Bell 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 64 KB 👁 1 views

ThinPrep processing, an automated cytopreparatory method, has been reported to show good correlation with conventional preparations and to reduce the rate of false-negative diagnoses. In a retrospective review of 230 consecutive nongynecologic cytology cases, we compare the ThinPrep (TP) method with

Comparison of conventional and thinprep
✍ K. Hees; P. B. Lebeau 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 373 KB 👁 1 views

## Cytologicalspecimens containing large amounts of mucus and/or blood are ofen a considerable problem as far as preparation and especially screening are concerned. The Thinprep''') -method, slides automatically, eliminates dSgiculties in both areas. Comparing ThinPreps to conventionally prepared sa

Comparison of ThinPrep® and conventional
✍ Regina de Luna; Mohamad A. Eloubeidi; Matthew V. Sheffield; Isam Eltoum; Nirag J 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract Use of ThinPrep® preparation for fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) is gaining popularity. However, there may be a difference in the morphology and the operating characteristics between ThinPrep and conventional methods. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of the tw