Although some differences have been reported, the reactions produced in man by the diethy!amide of lysergie acid (LSD-25) and mescaline seem very similar. Both drugs cause autonomic stimulation manifested by increased pupillary size, increase in pulse rate and blood pressure, and elevation of body t
Comparison of psilocin with psilocybin, mescaline and LSD-25
β Scribed by A. B. Wolbach; E. J. Miner; Harris Isbell
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1962
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 275 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-3158
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In the course of isolation of psilocybin (4-4-Phosphoryl-N: N-dimethyltryptamine) from the mushroom, psilocybe Mexicana, I/OFM_r et al., (1958) noticed trace amounts of another substance, which they termed psflocin. Later I-Io~A~N and T~OXLEg (1959) identified psiloein as 4-ttydroxy-N :N-dimethyltryptamine, or dephosphorylated psiloeybin. These investigators mentioned that KIEL~OLZ and G~IRss of the University Psychiatric Clinic in Basel had administered psilocin to humans and found that its action was similar quantitatively and quail tatively to that of psilocybin. More recently tIOgtTA and WEBER (1961) found that psilocybin was rapidly dephosphorylated to psiloein by alkaline phosphatase in diverse tissues of various mammals, tIOnlTA and WE~Eg speculated on the possibility that psilocin was the active substance in psilocybin.
The purpose of the present communication is to show that the objective and subjective effects of psilocin in man are similar to those of psilocybin, mescaline, and LSD-25, and further to report that psilocin and psilocybin are equipotent on a molecular basis.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
1. The objective and subjective effects of 0.5 and 1.5 meg/kg of LSD intramuscularly were compared with those of 75 and 225 mcg/kg of (--)-AP-transtetrahydrocannabinol by smoking in the same eight subjects. 2. The objective effects of LSD and THC differed markedly. LSD increased body temperature, s
Rats were trained in a straight runway on a non-spatial single alternation (NSSA) which involved presentation of reward (R) and nonreward (N) in a fixed repeating sequence (i.e. R--N--R--N...). Patterned running results since rats learned to run fast on R trials and slow on N trials. This task can b