Comparison of parametric and non-parametric survival methods using simulated clinical data
β Scribed by John W. Gamel; Robert L. Vogel
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 232 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We derived three parametric survival models (the log-normal, log logit, and Weibull) from the clinical data of chemotherapy trials for stage II breast cancer. We then used these models to generate simulated survival data, which we analysed using both parametric (log-normal) and non-parametric (logrank, Gray-Tsiatis and Laska-Meisner) methods. With limited follow-up (5 years), the non-parametric tests had greater power than the log-normal model. This advantage diminished, however, with extended follow-up (15 years). Furthermore, only the log-normal model could distinguish reliably a survival advantage due to an increase in cured fraction from an advantage due to an increase in time to failure.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The thermal relaxation times are characteristic parameters of deep levels which can be calculated by the analysis of admittance data. The contributions of these characteristic parameters can be sharp or broadened. If sharp contributions are assumed the analysis procedure is called a parametric metho
The statistic of interest in most health economic evaluations is the incremental cost-e!ectiveness ratio. Since the variance of a ratio estimator is intractable, the health economics literature has suggested a number of alternative approaches to estimating con"dence intervals for the cost-e!ectivene
## Abstract The World Health Report 2000 focuses on the performance of healthβcare systems around the globe. The report uses efficiency measurement techniques to create a league table of healthβcare systems, highlighting good and bad performers. Efficiency is measured using panel data methods. This