Comparison of methods to estimate the free energy of solvation:Importance in the modulation of the affinity of 3-benzazepines for the D1receptor
β Scribed by Ibon Alkorta; Hugo O. Villar; Juan J. Perez
- Book ID
- 102880795
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 641 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
We computed the free energy of solvation for a series of ions and neutral molecules using two different continuum approaches. First, we used the AM1βSM1 technique, where the AM1 Fock matrix is modified to include a generalized Born contribution. Second, we applied the DelPhi approach, where the electrostatic component of the free energy of solvation is evaluated by resolving the PoissonβBoltzman equation by a finite difference method. Both methods appear equally reliable for ionic systems. For neutral compounds, AM1βSM1 performs better than DelPhi; however, the differences become less pronounced for compounds with larger free energies of solvation. In parallel, both methods were applied to study the influence of the solvation process in the overall drug receptor interaction for a series of closely related ligands for the D~1~ dopamine receptor. An inverse linear relationship was found between the free energy of solvation and the logarithm of the affinity of the ligands; nevertheless, electrostatic properties are likely to modulate affinity as well. Β© 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
1,25-(OH) 2 D 3 (1,25) and 24,25-(OH) 2 D 3 (24,25) mediate their effects on chondrocytes through the classic vitamin D receptor (VDR) as well as through rapid membrane-mediated mechanisms, which result in both nongenomic and genomic effects. In intact cells, it is difficult to distinguish between g