Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis

✍ Scribed by Hui-Ju Tsai; Daniel E. Weeks

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2005
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 540 KB
• Volume: 30
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0741-0395
• DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20126

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

For complex traits, it may be possible to increase the power to detect linkage if one takes advantage of covariate information. Several statistics have been proposed that incorporate quantitative covariate information into affected sib pair (ASP) linkage analysis. However, it is not clear how these statistics perform under different gene‐environment (G × E) interactions. We compare representative statistics to each other on simulated data under three biologically‐plausible G × E models. We also compared their performance with a model‐free method and with quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage approaches. The statistics considered here are: (1) mixture model; (2) general conditional‐logistic model (LODPAL); (3) multinomial logistic regression models (MLRM); (4) extension of the maximum‐likelihood‐binomial approach (MLB); (5) ordered‐subset analysis (OSA); and (6) logistic regression modeling (COVLINK). In all three G × E models, most of these six statistics perform better when using the covariate C1 associated with a G × E interaction effect than when using the environmental risk factor C2 or the random noise covariate C3. Compared with a model‐free method without covariates (S~all~), the mixture model performs the best when using C1, with the high‐to‐low OSA method also performing quite well. Generally, MLB is the least sensitive to covariate choice. However, most of these statistics do not provide better power than S~all~. Thus, while inclusion of the “correct” covariate can lead to increased power, careful selection of appropriate covariates is vital for success. Genet. Epidemiol. 30:77–93, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.