✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of invasion in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional systems

✍ Scribed by M. Mareel

Book ID: 113146444
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1980
Weight: 184 KB
Volume: 16
Category: Article
ISSN: 0014-2964
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2964(80)90100-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-d

Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery

✍ Chan, A. C. W.; Chung, S. C. S.; Yim, A. P. C.; Lau, J. Y. W.; Ng, E. K. W.; Li, 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional morphometry of monogenoidean sclerites

✍ Paolo Galli; Giovanni Strona; Anna Maria Villa; Francesca Benzoni; Fabrizio Stef 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 543 KB

Comparison of three three-dimensional im

Comparison of three three-dimensional imaging systems

✍ Jones, Peter F.; Aitken, George J. M. 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Optical Society of America 🌐 English ⚖ 985 KB

Comparative study of two-dimensional and

Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery

✍ P. van Bergen; W. Kunert; J. Bessell; G. F. Buess 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 224 KB

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional culture systems: Effects on growth and productivity of BHK cells

✍ P. M. Alves; J. L. Moreira; J. M. Rodrigues; J. G. Aunins; M. J. T. Carrondo 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 327 KB 👁 2 views

The influence of surface growth (two-dimensional microcarriers) and three-dimensional growth (aggregates and macroporous supports) in agitated, suspended batch culture systems upon growth and productivity of BHK was compared. Cultures using three porous microcarriers (CultiSpher G, Cellsnow EX, and

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in evaluating fetal malformations

✍ Hui-Xiong Xu; Qing-Ping Zhang; Ming-De Lu; Xian-Tao Xiao 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 910 KB

## Purpose: We assessed the differences between 2-dimensional (2d) and 3-dimensional (3d) sonography (us) in evaluating fetal malformations. ## Methods: Both 2d us and 3d us were used to examine pregnant women whose fetuses had malformations. the diagnostic information provided by the modalities