✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of excision and swabbing sampling methods to determine the microbiological quality of swine carcass surfaces

✍ Scribed by S.A Palumbo; P Klein; J Capra; S Eblen; A.J Miller

Book ID: 112245123
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 133 KB
Volume: 16
Category: Article
ISSN: 0740-0020
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.1998.0259

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

COMPARISON OF EXCISION, SWABBING AND RIN

COMPARISON OF EXCISION, SWABBING AND RINSING SAMPLING METHODS TO DETERMINE THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF BROILER CARCASSES

✍ QIU QIN ZHANG; KE PING YE; XING LIAN XU; GUANG HONG ZHOU; JIN XUAN CAO 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Wiley (Blackwell Publishing) 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB

Comparison of swabbing and destructive m

Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling

✍ Y. Ghafir; G. Daube 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB

Excision vs sponge swabbing – a comparis

Excision vs sponge swabbing – a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses

✍ R.A. Pearce; D.J. Bolton 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 66 KB

Comparison Between Carcass Microbial Loa

Comparison Between Carcass Microbial Load Recovered by Swabbing Surfaces of Different Size and Using the Reference Excision Method

✍ D. Miraglia; D. Ranucci; V. D'Ovidio; R. Branciari; M. Severini 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

Comparison of methods to determine the m

Comparison of methods to determine the microbiological contamination of surfaces of beef carcasses by hydrophobic grid membrane filters, standard pour plates or flow cytometry

✍ K.W.F. Jericho; G.C. Kozub; K.G. Loewen; J. Ho 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 53 KB

Erratum to ‘‘A comparison of methods use

Erratum to ‘‘A comparison of methods used in the UK and Ireland for the extraction and detection of semen on swabs and cloth samples” [Science and Justice 47/4 (2007) 160–167]

✍ J.E. Allard; A. Baird; G. Davidson; S. Jones; J. Lewis; L. McKenna; C. Weston; D 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB

The publisher regrets that in the above article there was an error in the list of affiliations. The correct list is printed below. There was also an error in Table 7. PSA results attributed to lab 6 should be attributed to lab 7. The publisher apologises for these oversights.