✦ LIBER ✦

COMPARISON OF EXCISION, SWABBING AND RINSING SAMPLING METHODS TO DETERMINE THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF BROILER CARCASSES

✍ Scribed by QIU QIN ZHANG; KE PING YE; XING LIAN XU; GUANG HONG ZHOU; JIN XUAN CAO

Book ID: 111343427
Publisher: Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 182 KB
Volume: 32
Category: Article
ISSN: 0149-6085
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2011.00360.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Excision vs sponge swabbing – a comparis

Excision vs sponge swabbing – a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses

✍ R.A. Pearce; D.J. Bolton 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 66 KB

Comparison of swabbing and destructive m

Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling

✍ Y. Ghafir; G. Daube 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB

COMPARISON OF THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALIT

COMPARISON OF THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF INSPECTION-PASSED AND FECAL CONTAMINATION-CONDEMNED BROILER CARCASSES

✍ L. C. BLANKENSHIP; N. A. COX; S.E. CRAVEN; A. J. MERCURI; R. L. WILSON 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Institute of Food Technologists 🌐 English ⚖ 476 KB

Assessment of the microbiological condit

Assessment of the microbiological conditions of red-meat carcasses from bacterial counts recovered by sampling via excision or swabbing with cotton wool

✍ Bernardo Martínez; María Felicidad Celda; María Encarnación Millán; Aurora Espac 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 634 KB

Comparison Between Carcass Microbial Loa

Comparison Between Carcass Microbial Load Recovered by Swabbing Surfaces of Different Size and Using the Reference Excision Method

✍ D. Miraglia; D. Ranucci; V. D'Ovidio; R. Branciari; M. Severini 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

Erratum to ‘‘A comparison of methods use

Erratum to ‘‘A comparison of methods used in the UK and Ireland for the extraction and detection of semen on swabs and cloth samples” [Science and Justice 47/4 (2007) 160–167]

✍ J.E. Allard; A. Baird; G. Davidson; S. Jones; J. Lewis; L. McKenna; C. Weston; D 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB

The publisher regrets that in the above article there was an error in the list of affiliations. The correct list is printed below. There was also an error in Table 7. PSA results attributed to lab 6 should be attributed to lab 7. The publisher apologises for these oversights.