𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of efficiencies between single-drop microextraction and continuous-flow microextraction for the determination of methomyl in natural waters

✍ Scribed by Wei, Guohui; Li, Yanyan; Wang, Xuedong

Book ID
120635721
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Group
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
385 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0306-7319

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of continuous-flow microextra
Comparison of continuous-flow microextraction and static liquid-phase microextraction for the determination of p-toluidine in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
✍ Xiujuan Liu; Xiaowen Chen; Shao Yang; Xuedong Wang 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 751 KB

## Abstract In this study, two microextraction methods, __viz.__ continuous‐flow microextraction (CFME) and static liquid‐phase microextraction (s‐LPME), were optimized and compared for the determination of __p__‐toluidine in water and __Chlamydomonas reinhardtii__ samples. The calibration curve fo

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid
Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of methomyl in natural waters
✍ Guohui Wei; Yanyan Li; Xuedong Wang 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 280 KB

## Abstract A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of