𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of derivatization and chromatographic methods for GC–MS analysis of amino acid enantiomers in physiological samples

✍ Scribed by Magdalena C. Waldhier; Katja Dettmer; Michael A. Gruber; Peter J. Oefner


Book ID
108161155
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
681 KB
Volume
878
Category
Article
ISSN
1873-376X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Gc–ms analysis of diaminopimelic acid st
✍ Andreas Schieber; Hans Brückner; John R. Ling 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 69 KB

The amounts and the configuration of the stereoisomers of 2,6-diaminopimelic acid (Dap) and the enantiomeric content of other amino acids were determined in five individual species (Fibrobacter succinogenes, Streptococcus bovis, Selenomonas ruminantium, Prevotella ruminicola and Anaerovibrio lipolyt

Comparison of silylation and esterificat
✍ Tim G. Sobolevsky; Alexander I. Revelsky; Barbara Miller; Vincent Oriedo; Elena 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 165 KB

## Abstract Three derivatization agents used in GC analysis of amino acids were compared: __N,O__‐bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide, (BSTFA), __N__‐methyl‐__N__‐(__tert__‐butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA), and isobutyl chloroformate (iBuCF). It was shown that the analytical charac