𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of vascularization of hydroxyapatite orbital implants

✍ Scribed by Qi-hua, Xu; Chen, Zhao; Jian-gang, Zhu; Da-zhong, Zou; Yong-qiang, Zheng

Book ID
124137261
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2014
Tongue
English
Weight
565 KB
Volume
38
Category
Article
ISSN
0899-7071

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced
Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced CT biomarkers in bladder cancer
✍ J. H. Naish; D. M. McGrath; L. J. Bains; K. Passera; C. Roberts; Y. Watson; S. C 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 430 KB

## Abstract Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) is frequently used to provide response biomarkers in clinical trials of novel cancer therapeutics but assessment of their physiological accuracy is difficult. DCE‐CT provides an independent probe of similar pharmacokinetic processes and may be mod

Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastas
Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: Comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
✍ Ali Muhi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Utaroh Motosugi; Hironobu Sou; Hiroto Nakajima; Kats 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 513 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CE‐CT), contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography (CE‐US), superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (SPIO‐MRI), and gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI (Gd‐EOB‐MRI) in the evaluation of col

Method for the quantitative assessment o
Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
✍ Karl Hittmair; Gregor Gomiscek; Karl Langenberger; Michael Recht; Herwig Imhof; 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 499 KB

## Abstract In previous papers relative signal intensity increase was used as a quantitative assessment parameter for contrast uptake in contrastenhanced MRI. However, relative signal intensity increase does not only reflect contrast uptake but depends also on tissue parameters (native __T__~1~ rel

Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI of cartila
Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI of cartilage: Comparison of nonionic and ionic contrast agents
✍ Wei Li; Rachel Scheidegger; Ying Wu; Robert R. Edelman; Michelle Farley; Nitya K 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 473 KB

## Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate if cartilage fixed charge density is the only factor determining the distribution of the measured delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage index, T~1~(Gd‐DTPA^2−^), across cartilage in the clinical delayed gadolinium