## Abstract This paper concerns a technique for providing quantitative and qualitative answers to the questions related to accuracy and stability of finiteβdifference schemes. It is applicable to both the unsteady and the steady flows. The application of the technique provides comparative informati
β¦ LIBER β¦
Comparing problem formulations for coupled sets of
β Scribed by Sharon F. Arroyo; Evin J. Cramer; John E. Dennis; Paul D. Frank
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 833 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1389-4420
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comparative criteria for finite-differen
β
Akshai K. Runchal
π
Article
π
1977
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 624 KB
An alternative formulation for certain f
β
C.I. Chiang; M.J. Hwang; Y.H. Liu
π
Article
π
2005
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 130 KB
Maximizing set function formulation of t
β
B. Alidaee
π
Article
π
1992
π
Springer
π
English
β 311 KB
Boundary element formulation for plane p
β
A. R. Hadjesfandiari; G. F. Dargush
π
Article
π
2011
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 385 KB
On the set partitioning type formulation
β
J. Darzentas; P. Bairaktaris
π
Article
π
1986
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 666 KB
A finite element thermally coupled flow
β
Marcela A. Cruchaga; Diego J. Celentano
π
Article
π
2000
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 715 KB
A finite element, thermally coupled incompressible flow formulation considering phase-change effects is presented. This formulation accounts for natural convection, temperature-dependent material properties and isothermal and non-isothermal phase-change models. In this context, the full Navier -Stok