Comparing empirical results of transaction avoidance rules studies
β Scribed by Gijs van Dijck
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 172 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1180-0518
- DOI
- 10.1002/iir.158
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Empirical legal research in the United Kingdom (UK) and in The Netherlands (NL) has provided data on the extent to which the transaction avoidance rules (avoidance powers, actio Pauliana) generate practical problems. This paper's goal is to explore the similarities and differences of the data. To achieve this, existing empirical data found in Dutch and UK research are compared. From the comparison, it follows that the UK and NL share similar problems, that is there are no proceeds in a substantial number of cases in which the officeβholder (or liquidator) encounters a suspect transaction, the majority of the disputes are conducted in the shadow of the law, proceeds are obtained more often from settlements than from proceedings, insufficient funds and evidence problems are experienced as major obstacles for successfully invoking the transaction avoidance rules, and a presumption or shift of burden of proof influences the outcome significantly. Copyright Β© 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We consider the power and sample size calculation of diagnostic studies with normally distributed multiple correlated test results. We derive test statistics and obtain power and sample size formulas. The methods are illustrated using an example of comparison of CT and PET scanner for detecting extr
The present paper reports preliminary results of a pibt study carried out on two samples of females living in two different European countries. The onset of eating disorders is considered to result from females' difficulties in developing a genderspecific identity in a specific social context that p