𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparative Methods for the Evaluation of Protein Adsorption

✍ Scribed by Eva Servoli; Devid Maniglio; Maria Rosa Aguilar; Antonella Motta; Blanca Vazquez; Julio San Roman; Claudio Migliaresi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
600 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
1616-5187

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

AFM, Immunogold labeling and SPR have been successfully applied to the analysis of protein adsorption on fibroin substrates, chosen as a paradigmatic biomaterial. The process was evaluated both under static and dynamic conditions, also considering the effect of protein competition. AFM via antibody‐modified tips provided maps of protein adsorption and information on protein‐protein interactions. Double labeling Immunogold imaged protein distribution upon competitive adsorption. SPR described the dynamics of the process, offering also quantitative data both from individual and two‐component protein solutions. The integration of these analytical techniques and the critical evaluation of the results can provide a detailed description of protein adsorption.

magnified image


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A method for the prediction of protein a
✍ Bagnall, Robert David ;Arundel, Philip Anthony πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 327 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract A simple method is described for predicting aspects of the adsorptive behavior of selected plasma proteins on a wide range of implant surfaces from a limited number of interfacial free energy measurements. Although the theoretical basis of the predictive treatment is open to debate, it

Criteria for evaluating protein structur
✍ Česlovas Venclovas; Adam Zemla; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 357 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Following the first experiment for the Critical Assessment of methods for protein Structure Prediction (CASP1), numerical criteria were devised to analyze the performance of prediction methods. We report here the criteria for comparative modeling, and how effective they were in CASP2. These criteria

A comparative study of analytical method
✍ Croon, L.-B. ;Rogstad, Astri ;Leth, T. ;Kiutamo, T. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 502 KB

Four quick-test methods (the Foodoil sensor, RAU-Test,Fritest' and Spot test) and two ordinary laboratory methods (the free fatty acids and GLC determination of triglycerid h e r s ) were compared to a standard method (column chromatographic determination of polar compounds). One hundred samples col

Evaluation of comparative protein struct
✍ Roberto SΓ‘nchez; Andrej Ε ali πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 170 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We evaluate homology-derived 3D models of dihydrofolate reductase (DFR 1 ), phosphotransferase enzyme IIA domain (PTE2A 3 ), and mouse/human UBC9 protein (UBC9 24 ) which were submitted to the second Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP). The DFR 1